AI Governance & Risk in Tonsley Innovation District done the way Australian boards expect: senior operators, ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act-aligned reporting, no junior pipeline. AI governance that engineering teams will actually use — model and dataset inventory, risk tiering, red-team requirements per tier, and approval workflows that do not become the AI bottleneck. Mapped to NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 where it matters.
The manufacturing, defence, tech concentration around Tonsley Innovation District sees OT ransomware, manufacturing-line disruption and trade-secret IP theft. Our ai governance & risk work in SA / Adelaide advanced-manufacturing precinct is scoped against this real threat profile, not a generic checklist.
Every finding ships with a control reference against ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act, with ACSC guidance cited where it changes the remediation priority. Board reporting follows the APRA CPS 234 expectation set.
Basalt delivers ai governance & risk to organisations across Tonsley Innovation District and the wider SA / Adelaide advanced-manufacturing precinct region (population ~6k). The manufacturing, defence, tech sectors that anchor the region face a distinct threat profile — OT ransomware, manufacturing-line disruption and trade-secret IP theft — and our engagements are scoped to that, not a generic playbook. Reporting maps cleanly to the ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act that Australian boards already use, with regulator context (ACSC) called out where it changes a remediation priority.
Before a single test runs, we agree the decision the output will change — invest, divest, accept, fix. Tonsley Innovation District engagements without a named decision-maker don't get past scoping. That discipline keeps work focused.
Every finding is tagged against ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act controls with ACSC guidance cited where it shifts a remediation priority. Your compliance team stops re-mapping our reports.
AI Governance & Risk doesn't end at the report. Basalt's Tonsley Innovation District clients run retainer reviews on a quarterly cadence so the security posture compounds rather than drifting back six months after the engagement.
Cyber security in Australia can't be done with last year's threat models. The Basalt practice runs against current attacker tradecraft — agentic AI abuse, MCP and AI-tool supply chain, post-quantum readiness — alongside the legacy infrastructure work that still keeps most organisations awake at night.
Most Tonsley Innovation District engagements scope inside one week and start within two. Retainer clients can trigger work the same day. We do not pipeline Australian clients through junior teams — a senior consultant scopes and runs the work end-to-end.
Both. Sensitive work — classified-adjacent environments, live incident response, OT walkthroughs — gets on-site time in Tonsley Innovation District and the wider SA / Adelaide advanced-manufacturing precinct region. Routine assessments and detection engineering run remote with a tight feedback loop.
Every finding ships with a control reference against the ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act so your compliance team is not re-mapping our report. Where ACSC guidance exists for the specific finding, we cite it inline. Board-level reporting follows the APRA CPS 234 expectation set.
The manufacturing sector concentration in Tonsley Innovation District drives a different threat model than a generic Australian engagement — OT ransomware, manufacturing-line disruption and trade-secret IP theft. Our scoping reflects that, and so does the test library we bring to the work.
Yes — this is core to how we work. Basalt actively researches and tests against agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale, MCP server and AI-tool supply chain compromise and identity-first attack chains across federated SaaS. Most regional providers haven't mapped these attack paths; we run them in production against client systems with explicit scope.
Strategic cyber security consulting
Adversarial testing for LLMs and AI systems
CREST-aligned penetration testing
Source code review and SAST/DAST integration