Decision-first scoping
Before a single test runs, we agree the decision the output will change — invest, divest, accept, fix. Geelong engagements without a named decision-maker don't get past scoping. That discipline keeps work focused.
Geelong, Australia
Code Security Audit in Geelong.
Code Security Audit in Geelong — built for the manufacturing sector that drives the region. Manual and tooled code review across your highest-risk repos — secrets, auth, injection, deserialisation and supply-chain risk, with CI integration that keeps findings from coming back.
85% of findings ship with a working patch suggestion — across Basalt operations in the past 12 months.
THREAT VECTOR
Threats facing Geelong manufacturing.
The manufacturing, healthcare concentration around Geelong sees OT ransomware, manufacturing-line disruption and trade-secret IP theft. Our code security audit work in VIC is scoped against this real threat profile, not a generic checklist.
Common pains
- Tools that report thousands of low-quality findings
- No clear ownership for fixing vulnerabilities in code
- Supply-chain risk in third-party dependencies
ENGAGEMENT
How we engage.
- Manual review of high-risk code paths
- SAST + SCA integrated into CI with quality gates
- Threat model per service or repository
- Developer-grade fix guidance with sample patches
Reporting
Every finding ships with a control reference against ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act, with ACSC guidance cited where it changes the remediation priority. Board reporting follows the APRA CPS 234 expectation set.
LOCAL CONTEXT
Local context.
Basalt delivers code security audit to organisations across Geelong and the wider VIC region (population ~290k). The manufacturing, healthcare sectors that anchor the region face a distinct threat profile — OT ransomware, manufacturing-line disruption and trade-secret IP theft — and our engagements are scoped to that, not a generic playbook. Reporting maps cleanly to the ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act that Australian boards already use, with regulator context (ACSC) called out where it changes a remediation priority.
RATIONALE
Why Basalt for code security audit in Geelong.
Regulator-ready output
Every finding is tagged against ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act controls with ACSC guidance cited where it shifts a remediation priority. Your compliance team stops re-mapping our reports.
Continuous, not one-shot
Code Security Audit doesn't end at the report. Basalt's Geelong clients run retainer reviews on a quarterly cadence so the security posture compounds rather than drifting back six months after the engagement.
2026 THREAT LANDSCAPE
What we test for.
- Agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale
- MCP server and AI-tool supply chain compromise
- Post-quantum cryptographic readiness (NIST PQC migration)
- Identity-first attack chains across federated SaaS
- Open-source software supply chain (post-xz, post-tj-actions)
Cyber security in Australia can't be done with last year's threat models. The Basalt practice runs against current attacker tradecraft — agentic AI abuse, MCP and AI-tool supply chain, post-quantum readiness — alongside the legacy infrastructure work that still keeps most organisations awake at night.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions.
How fast can Basalt start a code security audit engagement in Geelong?
Most Geelong engagements scope inside one week and start within two. Retainer clients can trigger work the same day. We do not pipeline Australian clients through junior teams — a senior consultant scopes and runs the work end-to-end.
Do you do code security audit on-site in Geelong or remote?
Both. Sensitive work — classified-adjacent environments, live incident response, OT walkthroughs — gets on-site time in Geelong and the wider VIC region. Routine assessments and detection engineering run remote with a tight feedback loop.
How does Basalt map findings to Australian regulators?
Every finding ships with a control reference against the ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act so your compliance team is not re-mapping our report. Where ACSC guidance exists for the specific finding, we cite it inline. Board-level reporting follows the APRA CPS 234 expectation set.
What makes code security audit in Geelong different from a generic engagement?
The manufacturing sector concentration in Geelong drives a different threat model than a generic Australian engagement — OT ransomware, manufacturing-line disruption and trade-secret IP theft. Our scoping reflects that, and so does the test library we bring to the work.
Is Basalt set up for AI-era threats, not just legacy infrastructure?
Yes — this is core to how we work. Basalt actively researches and tests against agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale, MCP server and AI-tool supply chain compromise and identity-first attack chains across federated SaaS. Most regional providers haven't mapped these attack paths; we run them in production against client systems with explicit scope.
RELATED OPERATIONS
Other operations in Geelong.
Cyber Security Consulting in Geelong
Strategic cyber security consulting
AI Red Teaming in Geelong
Adversarial testing for LLMs and AI systems
Penetration Testing in Geelong
CREST-aligned penetration testing
Identity Threat Detection & Response in Geelong
ITDR for identity-driven attacks
OTHER DEPLOYMENTS
Code Security Audit in other Australia cities.
Code Security Audit in SydneyCode Security Audit in MelbourneCode Security Audit in BrisbaneCode Security Audit in PerthCode Security Audit in AdelaideCode Security Audit in Gold CoastCode Security Audit in NewcastleCode Security Audit in CanberraCode Security Audit in WollongongCode Security Audit in HobartCode Security Audit in TownsvilleCode Security Audit in Cairns