Senior-led delivery
Every Launceston engagement is led by a senior consultant — no junior pipelines, no resold capacity. Australian clients deal directly with the operators doing the work.
For agriculture teams across TAS, compliance consulting only generates value when it's mapped to the regulatory environment you actually operate in — ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act. Basalt scopes every engagement to that bar. Compliance work that does not bury your engineering team — ISO 27001, SOC 2, Essential Eight and NIST CSF mapped to controls you actually run, not parallel paperwork.
The agriculture, manufacturing concentration around Launceston sees IoT sensor compromise, supply-chain ransomware and grant/subsidy fraud. Our compliance consulting work in TAS is scoped against this real threat profile, not a generic checklist.
Every finding ships with a control reference against ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act, with ACSC guidance cited where it changes the remediation priority. Board reporting follows the APRA CPS 234 expectation set.
Basalt delivers compliance consulting to organisations across Launceston and the wider TAS region (population ~90k). The agriculture, manufacturing sectors that anchor the region face a distinct threat profile — IoT sensor compromise, supply-chain ransomware and grant/subsidy fraud — and our engagements are scoped to that, not a generic playbook. Reporting maps cleanly to the ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act that Australian boards already use, with regulator context (ACSC) called out where it changes a remediation priority.
Every Launceston engagement is led by a senior consultant — no junior pipelines, no resold capacity. Australian clients deal directly with the operators doing the work.
Findings and roadmaps reference the regulatory environment your business actually operates in — ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act. Board-level reporting follows the APRA CPS 234 expectation set, so what we deliver lands without translation.
We actively research and test agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale, MCP server and AI-tool supply chain compromise and post-quantum cryptographic readiness (NIST PQC migration) — attack paths most regional providers still haven't mapped. Forward-thinking cyber defence, not last year's playbook.
Cyber security in Australia can't be done with last year's threat models. The Basalt practice runs against current attacker tradecraft — agentic AI abuse, MCP and AI-tool supply chain, post-quantum readiness — alongside the legacy infrastructure work that still keeps most organisations awake at night.
Most Launceston engagements scope inside one week and start within two. Retainer clients can trigger work the same day. We do not pipeline Australian clients through junior teams — a senior consultant scopes and runs the work end-to-end.
Both. Sensitive work — classified-adjacent environments, live incident response, OT walkthroughs — gets on-site time in Launceston and the wider TAS region. Routine assessments and detection engineering run remote with a tight feedback loop.
Every finding ships with a control reference against the ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act so your compliance team is not re-mapping our report. Where ACSC guidance exists for the specific finding, we cite it inline. Board-level reporting follows the APRA CPS 234 expectation set.
The agriculture sector concentration in Launceston drives a different threat model than a generic Australian engagement — IoT sensor compromise, supply-chain ransomware and grant/subsidy fraud. Our scoping reflects that, and so does the test library we bring to the work.
Yes — this is core to how we work. Basalt actively researches and tests against agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale, MCP server and AI-tool supply chain compromise and identity-first attack chains across federated SaaS. Most regional providers haven't mapped these attack paths; we run them in production against client systems with explicit scope.
Strategic cyber security consulting
Adversarial testing for LLMs and AI systems
CREST-aligned penetration testing
Source code review and SAST/DAST integration