Wellington, New Zealand

Threat Intelligence in Wellington.

Threat Intelligence in Wellington done the way New Zealand boards expect: senior operators, NZ Privacy Act 2020 and NZISM-aligned reporting, no junior pipeline. Threat intelligence that drives detections and decisions, not PDF reports nobody reads — adversary-group tracking mapped to your attack surface, sector and geography, fed into your SOC and engineering teams.

4x increase in CTI-driven detections in client SIEMs — across Basalt operations in the past 12 months.

Threats facing Wellington government.

The government, tech concentration around Wellington sees state-aligned intrusion sets, supply chain compromise and credential phishing targeting cleared staff. Our threat intelligence work in Wellington is scoped against this real threat profile, not a generic checklist.

Common pains

  • CTI feeds that are noisy and never used by detections
  • No view of adversary interest in your sector or vendors
  • Dark-web exposure data that arrives weeks late

How we engage.

  • Adversary group profile mapped to your stack and sector
  • CTI-to-detection pipeline integrated with your SIEM/XDR
  • Dark-web and credential-leak monitoring with triage SLA
  • Quarterly threat brief for the board and engineering leadership

Reporting

Every finding ships with a control reference against NZ Privacy Act 2020 and NZISM, with GCSB / NCSC NZ guidance cited where it changes the remediation priority. Board reporting follows the CERT NZ Critical Controls expectation set.

Local context.

Basalt delivers threat intelligence to organisations across Wellington and the wider Wellington region (population ~440k). The government, tech sectors that anchor the region face a distinct threat profile — state-aligned intrusion sets, supply chain compromise and credential phishing targeting cleared staff — and our engagements are scoped to that, not a generic playbook. Reporting maps cleanly to the NZ Privacy Act 2020 and NZISM that New Zealand boards already use, with regulator context (GCSB / NCSC NZ) called out where it changes a remediation priority.

Why Basalt for threat intelligence in Wellington.

Decision-first scoping

Before a single test runs, we agree the decision the output will change — invest, divest, accept, fix. Wellington engagements without a named decision-maker don't get past scoping. That discipline keeps work focused.

Regulator-ready output

Every finding is tagged against NZ Privacy Act 2020 and NZISM controls with GCSB / NCSC NZ guidance cited where it shifts a remediation priority. Your compliance team stops re-mapping our reports.

Continuous, not one-shot

Threat Intelligence doesn't end at the report. Basalt's Wellington clients run retainer reviews on a quarterly cadence so the security posture compounds rather than drifting back six months after the engagement.

What we test for.

  • Agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale
  • MCP server and AI-tool supply chain compromise
  • Post-quantum cryptographic readiness (NIST PQC migration)
  • Identity-first attack chains across federated SaaS
  • Open-source software supply chain (post-xz, post-tj-actions)

Cyber security in New Zealand can't be done with last year's threat models. The Basalt practice runs against current attacker tradecraft — agentic AI abuse, MCP and AI-tool supply chain, post-quantum readiness — alongside the legacy infrastructure work that still keeps most organisations awake at night.

Frequently asked questions.

How fast can Basalt start a threat intelligence engagement in Wellington?

Most Wellington engagements scope inside one week and start within two. Retainer clients can trigger work the same day. We do not pipeline New Zealand clients through junior teams — a senior consultant scopes and runs the work end-to-end.

Do you do threat intelligence on-site in Wellington or remote?

Both. Sensitive work — classified-adjacent environments, live incident response, OT walkthroughs — gets on-site time in Wellington and the wider Wellington region. Routine assessments and detection engineering run remote with a tight feedback loop.

How does Basalt map findings to New Zealand regulators?

Every finding ships with a control reference against the NZ Privacy Act 2020 and NZISM so your compliance team is not re-mapping our report. Where GCSB / NCSC NZ guidance exists for the specific finding, we cite it inline. Board-level reporting follows the CERT NZ Critical Controls expectation set.

What makes threat intelligence in Wellington different from a generic engagement?

The government sector concentration in Wellington drives a different threat model than a generic New Zealand engagement — state-aligned intrusion sets, supply chain compromise and credential phishing targeting cleared staff. Our scoping reflects that, and so does the test library we bring to the work.

Is Basalt set up for AI-era threats, not just legacy infrastructure?

Yes — this is core to how we work. Basalt actively researches and tests against agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale, MCP server and AI-tool supply chain compromise and identity-first attack chains across federated SaaS. Most regional providers haven't mapped these attack paths; we run them in production against client systems with explicit scope.

Other operations in Wellington.

Cyber Security Consulting in Wellington

Strategic cyber security consulting

Explore →

AI Red Teaming in Wellington

Adversarial testing for LLMs and AI systems

Explore →

Penetration Testing in Wellington

CREST-aligned penetration testing

Explore →

Code Security Audit in Wellington

Source code review and SAST/DAST integration

Explore →

Threat Intelligence in other New Zealand cities.

One short call, no pitch deck.30 minutes with a senior operator. You leave knowing whether threat intelligence is the right next move for your Wellington team.

Get on the calendar