One-North, Singapore

Zero Trust Architecture in One-North.

What biomedical teams in One-North actually need from zero trust architecture isn't another vendor pitch — it's a senior consultant who's already worked the same threat profile elsewhere in Singapore. Zero trust architecture rolled out around your real systems — not a vendor demo. Identity-first segmentation, device posture, application-aware proxying and continuous verification, sequenced so engineering teams keep shipping.

Average 70% reduction in lateral movement paths in the first 6 months — across Basalt operations in the past 12 months.

Threats facing One-North biomedical.

The biomedical, research, tech concentration around One-North sees IP exfiltration, lab-system intrusion and clinical-trial data theft. Our zero trust architecture work in Queenstown / Singapore R&D precinct is scoped against this real threat profile, not a generic checklist.

Common pains

  • VPN-era access controls trusted broadly by network position
  • No device posture or session signal feeding access decisions
  • Microsegmentation that died on the whiteboard

How we engage.

  • Zero trust maturity assessment against CISA / NCSC reference architectures
  • Identity-aware proxy and ZTNA rollout sequenced by app criticality
  • Device posture and conditional access policy design
  • Segmentation roadmap that survives engineering velocity

Reporting

Every finding ships with a control reference against MAS TRM and Cybersecurity Act 2018, with CSA / MAS guidance cited where it changes the remediation priority. Board reporting follows the MAS Notice 655 expectation set.

Local context.

Basalt delivers zero trust architecture to organisations across One-North and the wider Queenstown / Singapore R&D precinct region (population ~15k). The biomedical, research, tech sectors that anchor the region face a distinct threat profile — IP exfiltration, lab-system intrusion and clinical-trial data theft — and our engagements are scoped to that, not a generic playbook. Reporting maps cleanly to the MAS TRM and Cybersecurity Act 2018 that Singaporean boards already use, with regulator context (CSA / MAS) called out where it changes a remediation priority.

Why Basalt for zero trust architecture in One-North.

Decision-first scoping

Before a single test runs, we agree the decision the output will change — invest, divest, accept, fix. One-North engagements without a named decision-maker don't get past scoping. That discipline keeps work focused.

Regulator-ready output

Every finding is tagged against MAS TRM and Cybersecurity Act 2018 controls with CSA / MAS guidance cited where it shifts a remediation priority. Your compliance team stops re-mapping our reports.

Continuous, not one-shot

Zero Trust Architecture doesn't end at the report. Basalt's One-North clients run retainer reviews on a quarterly cadence so the security posture compounds rather than drifting back six months after the engagement.

What we test for.

  • Agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale
  • MCP server and AI-tool supply chain compromise
  • Post-quantum cryptographic readiness (NIST PQC migration)
  • Identity-first attack chains across federated SaaS
  • Open-source software supply chain (post-xz, post-tj-actions)

Cyber security in Singapore can't be done with last year's threat models. The Basalt practice runs against current attacker tradecraft — agentic AI abuse, MCP and AI-tool supply chain, post-quantum readiness — alongside the legacy infrastructure work that still keeps most organisations awake at night.

Frequently asked questions.

How fast can Basalt start a zero trust architecture engagement in One-North?

Most One-North engagements scope inside one week and start within two. Retainer clients can trigger work the same day. We do not pipeline Singaporean clients through junior teams — a senior consultant scopes and runs the work end-to-end.

Do you do zero trust architecture on-site in One-North or remote?

Both. Sensitive work — classified-adjacent environments, live incident response, OT walkthroughs — gets on-site time in One-North and the wider Queenstown / Singapore R&D precinct region. Routine assessments and detection engineering run remote with a tight feedback loop.

How does Basalt map findings to Singaporean regulators?

Every finding ships with a control reference against the MAS TRM and Cybersecurity Act 2018 so your compliance team is not re-mapping our report. Where CSA / MAS guidance exists for the specific finding, we cite it inline. Board-level reporting follows the MAS Notice 655 expectation set.

What makes zero trust architecture in One-North different from a generic engagement?

The biomedical sector concentration in One-North drives a different threat model than a generic Singaporean engagement — IP exfiltration, lab-system intrusion and clinical-trial data theft. Our scoping reflects that, and so does the test library we bring to the work.

Is Basalt set up for AI-era threats, not just legacy infrastructure?

Yes — this is core to how we work. Basalt actively researches and tests against agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale, MCP server and AI-tool supply chain compromise and identity-first attack chains across federated SaaS. Most regional providers haven't mapped these attack paths; we run them in production against client systems with explicit scope.

Other operations in One-North.

Cyber Security Consulting in One-North

Strategic cyber security consulting

Explore →

AI Red Teaming in One-North

Adversarial testing for LLMs and AI systems

Explore →

Penetration Testing in One-North

CREST-aligned penetration testing

Explore →

Code Security Audit in One-North

Source code review and SAST/DAST integration

Explore →

Zero Trust Architecture in other Singapore cities.

One short call, no pitch deck.30 minutes with a senior operator. You leave knowing whether zero trust architecture is the right next move for your One-North team.

Get on the calendar