Lot Fourteen, Australia

Code Security Audit in Lot Fourteen.

Independent code security audit for Lot Fourteen-based cyber organisations — board-ready reporting mapped to ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act. Manual and tooled code review across your highest-risk repos — secrets, auth, injection, deserialisation and supply-chain risk, with CI integration that keeps findings from coming back.

85% of findings ship with a working patch suggestion — across Basalt operations in the past 12 months.

Threats facing Lot Fourteen cyber.

The cyber, space, defence concentration around Lot Fourteen sees targeted intrusion, supply chain abuse against client tooling and analyst-credential theft. Our code security audit work in SA / Adelaide cyber and space precinct is scoped against this real threat profile, not a generic checklist.

Common pains

  • Tools that report thousands of low-quality findings
  • No clear ownership for fixing vulnerabilities in code
  • Supply-chain risk in third-party dependencies

How we engage.

  • Manual review of high-risk code paths
  • SAST + SCA integrated into CI with quality gates
  • Threat model per service or repository
  • Developer-grade fix guidance with sample patches

Reporting

Every finding ships with a control reference against ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act, with ACSC guidance cited where it changes the remediation priority. Board reporting follows the APRA CPS 234 expectation set.

Local context.

Basalt delivers code security audit to organisations across Lot Fourteen and the wider SA / Adelaide cyber and space precinct region (population ~2k). The cyber, space, defence sectors that anchor the region face a distinct threat profile — targeted intrusion, supply chain abuse against client tooling and analyst-credential theft — and our engagements are scoped to that, not a generic playbook. Reporting maps cleanly to the ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act that Australian boards already use, with regulator context (ACSC) called out where it changes a remediation priority.

Why Basalt for code security audit in Lot Fourteen.

Operator-grade

The team that scopes your work in Lot Fourteen is the team that runs it. The architects are the operators. Findings come from people who've actually exploited what they're describing — not desk research.

Australia threat fluency

Local context matters: targeted intrusion, supply chain abuse against client tooling and analyst-credential theft. Basalt's Lot Fourteen engagements are scoped to the threat profile of cyber teams in SA / Adelaide cyber and space precinct, not a generic global checklist.

2026 attack surface

Where most regional providers are still testing for 2022 threat models, Basalt actively works agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale and identity-first attack chains across federated SaaS in production engagements. Forward-leaning, not theoretical.

What we test for.

  • Agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale
  • MCP server and AI-tool supply chain compromise
  • Post-quantum cryptographic readiness (NIST PQC migration)
  • Identity-first attack chains across federated SaaS
  • Open-source software supply chain (post-xz, post-tj-actions)

Cyber security in Australia can't be done with last year's threat models. The Basalt practice runs against current attacker tradecraft — agentic AI abuse, MCP and AI-tool supply chain, post-quantum readiness — alongside the legacy infrastructure work that still keeps most organisations awake at night.

Frequently asked questions.

How fast can Basalt start a code security audit engagement in Lot Fourteen?

Most Lot Fourteen engagements scope inside one week and start within two. Retainer clients can trigger work the same day. We do not pipeline Australian clients through junior teams — a senior consultant scopes and runs the work end-to-end.

Do you do code security audit on-site in Lot Fourteen or remote?

Both. Sensitive work — classified-adjacent environments, live incident response, OT walkthroughs — gets on-site time in Lot Fourteen and the wider SA / Adelaide cyber and space precinct region. Routine assessments and detection engineering run remote with a tight feedback loop.

How does Basalt map findings to Australian regulators?

Every finding ships with a control reference against the ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act so your compliance team is not re-mapping our report. Where ACSC guidance exists for the specific finding, we cite it inline. Board-level reporting follows the APRA CPS 234 expectation set.

What makes code security audit in Lot Fourteen different from a generic engagement?

The cyber sector concentration in Lot Fourteen drives a different threat model than a generic Australian engagement — targeted intrusion, supply chain abuse against client tooling and analyst-credential theft. Our scoping reflects that, and so does the test library we bring to the work.

Is Basalt set up for AI-era threats, not just legacy infrastructure?

Yes — this is core to how we work. Basalt actively researches and tests against agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale, MCP server and AI-tool supply chain compromise and identity-first attack chains across federated SaaS. Most regional providers haven't mapped these attack paths; we run them in production against client systems with explicit scope.

Other operations in Lot Fourteen.

Cyber Security Consulting in Lot Fourteen

Strategic cyber security consulting

Explore →

AI Red Teaming in Lot Fourteen

Adversarial testing for LLMs and AI systems

Explore →

Penetration Testing in Lot Fourteen

CREST-aligned penetration testing

Explore →

Identity Threat Detection & Response in Lot Fourteen

ITDR for identity-driven attacks

Explore →

Code Security Audit in other Australia cities.

Lot Fourteen cyber team? Let's scope it.30-minute call. We'll tell you honestly whether this is a fit and what the right first slice is.

Start scoping