Decision-first scoping
Before a single test runs, we agree the decision the output will change — invest, divest, accept, fix. Tech Central Sydney engagements without a named decision-maker don't get past scoping. That discipline keeps work focused.
Incident Response in Tech Central Sydney done the way Australian boards expect: senior operators, ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act-aligned reporting, no junior pipeline. Incident response and retainer services for the moments where minutes matter — containment, forensics, communications and lessons-learned, on call when the page fires.
The tech, fintech, AI startups concentration around Tech Central Sydney sees CI/CD supply chain compromise, OAuth token theft and AI/LLM prompt injection at scale. Our incident response work in NSW / Camperdown-Eveleigh innovation precinct is scoped against this real threat profile, not a generic checklist.
Every finding ships with a control reference against ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act, with ACSC guidance cited where it changes the remediation priority. Board reporting follows the APRA CPS 234 expectation set.
Basalt delivers incident response to organisations across Tech Central Sydney and the wider NSW / Camperdown-Eveleigh innovation precinct region (population ~25k). The tech, fintech, AI startups sectors that anchor the region face a distinct threat profile — CI/CD supply chain compromise, OAuth token theft and AI/LLM prompt injection at scale — and our engagements are scoped to that, not a generic playbook. Reporting maps cleanly to the ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act that Australian boards already use, with regulator context (ACSC) called out where it changes a remediation priority.
Before a single test runs, we agree the decision the output will change — invest, divest, accept, fix. Tech Central Sydney engagements without a named decision-maker don't get past scoping. That discipline keeps work focused.
Every finding is tagged against ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act controls with ACSC guidance cited where it shifts a remediation priority. Your compliance team stops re-mapping our reports.
Incident Response doesn't end at the report. Basalt's Tech Central Sydney clients run retainer reviews on a quarterly cadence so the security posture compounds rather than drifting back six months after the engagement.
Cyber security in Australia can't be done with last year's threat models. The Basalt practice runs against current attacker tradecraft — agentic AI abuse, MCP and AI-tool supply chain, post-quantum readiness — alongside the legacy infrastructure work that still keeps most organisations awake at night.
Most Tech Central Sydney engagements scope inside one week and start within two. Retainer clients can trigger work the same day. We do not pipeline Australian clients through junior teams — a senior consultant scopes and runs the work end-to-end.
Both. Sensitive work — classified-adjacent environments, live incident response, OT walkthroughs — gets on-site time in Tech Central Sydney and the wider NSW / Camperdown-Eveleigh innovation precinct region. Routine assessments and detection engineering run remote with a tight feedback loop.
Every finding ships with a control reference against the ASD Essential Eight and SOCI Act so your compliance team is not re-mapping our report. Where ACSC guidance exists for the specific finding, we cite it inline. Board-level reporting follows the APRA CPS 234 expectation set.
The tech sector concentration in Tech Central Sydney drives a different threat model than a generic Australian engagement — CI/CD supply chain compromise, OAuth token theft and AI/LLM prompt injection at scale. Our scoping reflects that, and so does the test library we bring to the work.
Yes — this is core to how we work. Basalt actively researches and tests against agentic AI tool-abuse and indirect prompt injection at scale, MCP server and AI-tool supply chain compromise and identity-first attack chains across federated SaaS. Most regional providers haven't mapped these attack paths; we run them in production against client systems with explicit scope.
Strategic cyber security consulting
Adversarial testing for LLMs and AI systems
CREST-aligned penetration testing
Source code review and SAST/DAST integration